Original Research
In-depth investigation of turn-around time of full blood count tests requested from a clinical haematology outpatient department in Cape Town, South Africa
Submitted: 27 June 2020 | Published: 29 April 2021
About the author(s)
Leonard Mutema, Department of Haematological Pathology, Tygerberg Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; and, Department of Internal Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South AfricaZivanai Chapanduka, Department of Haematological Pathology, Tygerberg Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Fungai Musaigwa, Department of Haematological Pathology, Tygerberg Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Nomusa Mashigo, Department of Haematological Pathology, Tygerberg Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Background: The performance of laboratories can be objectively assessed using the overall turn-around time (TAT). However, TAT is defined differently by the laboratory and clinicians; therefore, it is important to determine the contribution of all the different components making up the laboratory test cycle.
Objective: We carried out a retrospective analysis of the TAT of full blood count tests requested from the haematology outpatient department at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, with an aim to assess laboratory performance and to identify critical steps influencing TAT.
Methods: A retrospective audit was carried out, focused on the full blood count tests from the haematology outpatient department within a period of 3 months between 01 February and 30 April 2018. Data was extracted from the National Health Laboratory Service laboratory information system. The time intervals of all the phases of the test cycle were determined and total TAT and within-laboratory (intra-lab) TAT were calculated.
Results: A total of 1176 tests were analysed. The total TAT median was 275 (interquartile range [IQR] 200.0–1537.7) min with the most prolonged phase being from authorisation to review by clinicians (median 114 min; IQR: 37.0–1338.5 min). The median intra-lab TAT was 55 (IQR 40–81) min and 90% of the samples were processed in the laboratory within 134 min of registration.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that the intra-lab TAT was within the set internal benchmark of 3 h. Operational phases that were independent of the laboratory processes contributed the most to total TAT.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5544Total article views: 8510
Crossref Citations
1. Assessment of the Number of Phlebotomists in a Newly Established Sample Collection Center
Sindhu Toomukuntla, Chandra Vamshi Vemula, Parag Patil, Shrinivas B Somalwar, Gunvanti Rathod, Shailaja Prabhala
Cureus year: 2023
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43323
2. Retrospective analyses of routine preoperative blood testing in a tertiary eye hospital: could Choosing Wisely work in China?
Yunxi Lai, Weiting Zeng, Jingyu Liao, Yubin Yu, Xiuping Liu, Kaili Wu
British Journal of Ophthalmology vol: 108 issue: 6 first page: 897 year: 2024
doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-322431
3. Evaluating turnaround time to improve clients’ satisfaction in the tuberculosis reference laboratory in Douala
Teyim Pride Mbuh, Anya Priscilla Amveilla, Patricia Mendjime, Valérie Flore Donkeng Donfack, Mohamed Youssouf Mfouapon, Hamada Beloko, Bisso Ngono Annie Prudence, Esso Linda, Georges Alain Etoundi Mballa, Enoch Aninagyei
PLOS One vol: 20 issue: 6 first page: e0323917 year: 2025
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323917
4. Turnaround Time of Laboratory Investigations and Factors Responsible for Delays in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India: A Cross-Sectional Study
Naveen K G, Shamshad Ahmad, Pragya Kumar, Mala Mahto, Shreekant Bharti
Cureus year: 2026
doi: 10.7759/cureus.100703
5. Turnaround Time of the Hematology Results of Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Opportunity to Initiate a Quality Improvement Process
Asmae El Assil, Souad Benkirane, Yasmine El Kettani , Ali Cherif Chefchaouni , Hassane Mamad, Younes Rahali, Azlarab Masrar
Cureus year: 2024
doi: 10.7759/cureus.61149
