Lessons from the Field
Experience of quality management system in a clinical laboratory in Nigeria
Submitted: 09 December 2011 | Published: 29 October 2012
About the author(s)
Rosemary A. Audu, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, NigeriaUgochukwu Sylvester-Ikondu, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Chika K. Onwuamah, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Olumuyiwa B. Salu, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Fehintola A. Ige, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Emily Meshack, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Maureen Aniedobe, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Olufemi S. Amoo, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Azuka P. Okwuraiwe, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Florence Okhiku, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Chika L. Okoli, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Emmanuel O. Fasela, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Ebenezer O. Odewale, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Roseline O. Aleshinloye, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Micheal Olatunji, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Emmanuel O. Idigbe, Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
Abstract
Description: In 2005, two personnel from the HVL spent time studying quality systems in a certified clinical laboratory in Dakar, Senegal. Following this peer-to-peer technical assistance, several training sessions were undertaken by HVL staff, a baseline assessment was conducted, and processes were established. The HVL has monitored its quality indicators and conducted internal and external audits; these analyses (from 2007 to 2009) are presented herein.
Lessons learned: Although there was improvement in the pre-analytical and analytical indicators analysed and although data-entry errors decreased in the post-analytical process, the delay in returning laboratory test results increased significantly. There were several factors identified as causes for this delay and all of these have now been addressed except for an identified need for automation of some high-volume assays (currently being negotiated). Internal and external audits showed a trend of increasing non-conformities which could be the result of personnel simply becoming lax over time. Application for laboratory accreditation, however, could provide the renewed vigour needed to correct these non-conformities.
Recommendation: This experience shows that sustainability of the QMS at present is a cause for concern. However, the tiered system of accreditation being developed by WHO–Afro may act as a driving force to preserve the spirit of continual improvement.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 10960Total article views: 20413
Crossref Citations
1. Enhancing Biosafety and Biosecurity: Quality Management in High-Containment Laboratories
Fatma Altıntaş, Ahmet Koluman
Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi vol: 35 issue: 1 first page: 105 year: 2024
doi: 10.35864/evmd.1366594