Original Research

Implementation of quality management systems and progress towards accreditation of National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratories in Africa

Heidi Albert, Jean de Dieu Iragena, Kekeletso Kao, Donatelle Erni, Teferi Mekonen, Philip C. Onyebujoh
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine | Vol 6, No 2 | a490 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v6i2.490 | © 2017 Heidi Albert, Jean de Dieu Iragena, Kekeletso Kao, Donatelle Erni, Teferi Mekonen, Philip C. Onyebujoh | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 May 2016 | Published: 31 March 2017

About the author(s)

Heidi Albert, FIND, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Jean de Dieu Iragena, World Health Organisation, African Region Country Office, Brazzaville, Congo
Kekeletso Kao, FIND, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
Donatelle Erni, FIND, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
Teferi Mekonen, African Society for Laboratory Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Philip C. Onyebujoh, World Health Organisation, African Region Country Office, Harare, Zimbabwe

Abstract

Background: Laboratory services are essential at all stages of the tuberculosis care cascade, from diagnosis and drug resistance testing to monitoring response to treatment. Enabling access to quality services is a challenge in low-resource settings. Implementation of a strong quality management system (QMS) and laboratory accreditation are key to improving patient care.

Objectives: The study objective was to determine the status of QMS implementation and progress towards accreditation of National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratories (NTRLs) in the African Region.

Method: An online questionnaire was administered to NTRL managers in 47 World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa member states in the region, between February and April 2015, regarding the knowledge of QMS tools and progress toward implementation to inform strategies for tuberculosis diagnostic services strengthening in the region.

Results: A total of 21 laboratories (43.0%) had received SLMTA/TB-SLMTA training, of which 10 had also used the Global Laboratory Initiative accreditation tool. However, only 36.7% of NTRLs had received a laboratory audit, a first step in quality improvement. Most NTRLs participated in acid-fast bacilli microscopy external quality assurance (95.8%), although external quality assurance for other techniques was lower (60.4% for first-line drug susceptibility testing, 25.0% for second-line drug susceptibility testing, and 22.9% for molecular testing). Barriers to accreditation included lack of training and accreditation programmes. Only 28.6%of NTRLs had developed strategic plans and budgets which included accreditation.

Conclusion: Good foundations are in place on the continent from which to scale up accreditation efforts. Laboratory audits should be conducted as a first step in developing quality improvement action plans. Political commitment and strong leadership are needed to drive accreditation efforts; advocacy will require clear evidence of patient impact and cost-benefit.


Keywords

Tuberculosis; laboratories; accreditation; quality management systems; Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 4227
Total article views: 21840

 

Crossref Citations

1. An overview of medical diagnostic laboratories in South Africa that meet the international standard of accreditation: ISO 15189
H Khadambi-Morokane, K Bhowan, S Ayuk
The Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology of South Africa  vol: 3  issue: 1  first page: 27  year: 2021  
doi: 10.36303/JMLSTSA.2021.3.1.61