Original Research

Impact of rapid centrifugation on routine coagulation assays in South Africa

Reola Haripersadh, Dashini Pillay, Nadine Rapiti
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine | Vol 11, No 1 | a1901 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1901 | © 2022 Reola Haripersadh, Dashini Pillay, Nadine Rapiti | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 24 March 2022 | Published: 28 November 2022

About the author(s)

Reola Haripersadh, Department of Haematology, National Health Laboratory Services, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa; and, Department of Haematology, School of Laboratory Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Dashini Pillay, Department of Haematology, National Health Laboratory Services, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa; and, Department of Haematology, School of Laboratory Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Nadine Rapiti, Department of Haematology, National Health Laboratory Services, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa; and, Department of Haematology, School of Laboratory Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The recommendation for coagulation blood samples is to centrifuge at 4000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 15 min to produce platelet-poor plasma before analysis. Rapid centrifugation, defined as centrifuging samples at higher speeds for shorter durations, could potentially reduce turn-around times (TAT), provided sample integrity is maintained.

Objective: This study assessed the impact of rapid centrifugation on routine coagulation assay results.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from volunteers at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital and King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, from September to November 2021. Samples were centrifuged using Method A, the current standard (4000 rpm/15 min), Method B (4000 rpm/10 min), Method C (5000 rpm/10 min) and Method D (5000 rpm/5 min). Platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were analysed and results from Methods B, C and D compared to reference Method A.

Results: Platelet-poor plasma was obtained from all samples (n = 60) using Methods A and B, and from 33/60 (55%) samples using Methods C and D. Differences between Method A and Methods C and D for normal prothrombin time, normal D-dimer and abnormal TT results were statistically significant. Prothrombin time results correlated strongly across all methods, while TT and D-dimer results correlated poorly. Activated partial thromboplastin time and fibrinogen results showed no significant differences across all methods.

Conclusion: Rapid centrifugation at 4000 rpm/10 min (Method B) showed results consistent with the reference method. This method could potentially reduce the overall TAT for routine coagulation assays.


Keywords

rapid centrifugation; coagulation assays; platelet-poor plasma; pre-analytic; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines; haemostasis

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2425
Total article views: 2515

 

Crossref Citations

1. The reliability of functional and systemic markers of muscle damage in response to a flywheel squat protocol
Trevor J. Dufner, Alexandria D. Iacono, Jacob R. Wheeler, Natalia B. Lanier, Gabrielle Gillespie, Amalia E. Proper, Jessica M. Moon, Sarah K. Fretti, Jeffrey R. Stout, Marco Beato, Adam J. Wells
European Journal of Applied Physiology  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05656-3