Lessons from the Field
Implementation of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation
Submitted: 04 November 2014 | Published: 20 May 2016
About the author(s)
Jean-Bosco Ndihokubwayo, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, CongoTalkmore Maruta, African Society for Laboratory Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Nqobile Ndlovu, African Society for Laboratory Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Sikhulile Moyo, Botswana-Harvard AIDS Institute Partnerships, Gaborone, Botswana
Ali Ahmed Yahaya, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
Sheick Oumar Coulibaly, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
Francis Kasolo, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
David Turgeon, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Angelii P. Abrol, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Abstract
SLIPTA implementation process: WHO AFRO defined a governance structure with roles and responsibilities for six main stakeholders. Laboratories were evaluated by auditors trained and certified by the African Society for Laboratory Medicine. Laboratory performance was measured using the WHO AFRO SLIPTA scoring checklist and recognition certificates rated with 1–5 stars were issued.
Preliminary results: By March 2015, 27 of the 47 (57%) WHO AFRO member states had appointed a SLIPTA focal point and 14 Ministers of Health had endorsed SLIPTA as the desired programme for continuous quality improvement. Ninety-eight auditors from 17 African countries, competent in the Portuguese (3), French (12) and English (83) languages, were trained and certified. The mean score for the 159 laboratories audited between May 2013 and March 2015 was 69% (median 70%; SD 11.5; interquartile range 62–77). Of these audited laboratories, 70% achieved 55% compliance or higher (2 or more stars) and 1% scored at least 95% (5 stars). The lowest scoring sections of the WHO AFRO SLIPTA checklist were sections 6 (Internal Audit) and 10 (Corrective Action), which both had mean scores below 50%.
Conclusion: The WHO AFRO SLIPTA is a process that countries with limited resources can adopt for effective implementation of quality management systems. Political commitment, ownership and investment in continuous quality improvement are integral components of the process.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 7472Total article views: 9279
Crossref Citations
1. Clinical Referral Laboratories in Rwanda
Vincent Rusanganwa, Jean Bosco Gahutu, Innocent Nzabahimana, Jean Marie Vianney Ngendakabaniga, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Magnus Evander
American Journal of Clinical Pathology vol: 150 issue: 3 first page: 240 year: 2018
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy047