About the Author(s)


Aderonke O. Oluwo Email symbol
Dental Division, Massey Street Children’s Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria

Mary A. Lawal symbol
Medical Division, Massey Street Children’s Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria

Cecilia A. Mabogunje symbol
Medical Division, Massey Street Children’s Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria

Olubunmi T. Okurame symbol
Laboratory Unit, Massey Street Children’s Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria

Citation


Oluwo AO, Lawal MA, Mabogunje CA, Okurame OT. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern among children admitted to a hospital in Nigeria: A retrospective study. Afr J Lab Med. 2024;13(1), a2362. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2362

Original Research

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern among children admitted to a hospital in Nigeria: A retrospective study

Aderonke O. Oluwo, Mary A. Lawal, Cecilia A. Mabogunje, Olubunmi T. Okurame

Received: 06 Nov. 2023; Accepted: 24 May 2024; Published: 20 Aug. 2024

Copyright: © 2024. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: The impact of antimicrobial resistance on children living in resource-limited countries has been underreported, despite its established global threat.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to describe the trend of antibiotic susceptibility in the paediatric age group.

Methods: Sensitivity test report data consisting of 300 paediatric patients aged 18 hours to 192 months were retrieved from the microbiology laboratory records at a state-owned children’s hospital in Nigeria over a period of 4 months starting from December 2021 to March 2022. Five genera (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp.) were cultured as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute, using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out on isolates using 15 different antibiotics.

Results: Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent pathogen isolated 32.1% (50/156) and Pseudomonas spp. was the least frequent pathogen isolated 7.1% (11/156) in all samples. The isolates with the highest rate of resistance to the tested antibiotics were S. aureus 32.1% (50/156), E. coli 28.2% (44/156) and Klebsiella spp. 20.5% (32/156). Isolates in all age groups were more resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, cefuroxime and cefepime.

Conclusion: Antibiotic resistance is high, especially the younger Nigerian children. Strict antibiotic protocols should be adhered to especially in the use of empirical antibiotic therapy in hospitals.

What this study adds: Our study reveals a higher trend of antibiotic resistance, especially in younger children. It further shows that the pathogens are most resistant to the most available empirical antibiotics in Nigeria.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance; children; bacteria pathogens; susceptibility pattern; antibiotic therapy.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health issue for both epidemiologic and economic reasons.1 The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates about 700 000 deaths yearly due to multi-drug resistance, with 200 000 deaths occurring in neonates.2 Antimicrobial resistance, described as a global crisis, is causing difficulty in the treatment of common bacterial infections in children and is, in some instances, making treatment impossible.1,2 This has led to fatal outcomes as evident in an increase in mortality and morbidity among the paediatric age group.1,3

Antibiotics are among the most prescribed drugs, both in the hospital and within the community, in the paediatric age group.3 The factors that guide such prescriptions are often invalid, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, where self-medication is high and the use of unmeasured herbal medication is common practice.4 The inadequate microbiology laboratories and equipment often justifies the empirical use of antibiotics in children.5,6,7 The development of bacterial resistance mechanisms is a normal process, regardless of resistance gene acquisition or gene mutation; however, inappropriate or unregulated use is believed to hasten the process.1 Abuse of antibacterial agents in humans provides a selective pressure that promotes and spreads resistant strains.1 Unnecessary prescriptions used in the management of viral infections and other non-communicable diseases, coupled with inappropriate dosage, have contributed to an increase in the development of multi-drug resistant bacteria species.5,6,7

A lack of equipped laboratories, coupled with non-adherence to infection prevention and control practices, increases the risk of AMR, reduces the quality of care, and increases paediatric morbidity and mortality.5,8,9,10 In the West African region, absence of monitoring of licensed pharmaceutical vendors has given way to availability of many first- and second-line antibiotics as over-the-counter medications. This unguided practice, alongside the widespread patronage of drug hawkers, reduces the strength of antimicrobial surveillance within the region. Likewise, the pattern of antibiotic resistance is not well studied in children, despite the high usage of antibiotics in this age group. The African continent has a major setback in accrued data on AMR.9 The WHO considers Africa to have a wide gap on recorded prevalence of AMR as compared to most other continents.11 This can be attributed to weak national surveillance systems in many African nations. For instance, in a 2023 WHO survey,12 the One Health approach created by the organisation was found to be efficient in only eight African countries.12 The One Health approach aims to prevent and control AMR by employing stakeholders in different disciplines and sectors to work together through surveillance and shared databases.12 An earlier report on Central and East African nations clearly defined the inadequacy in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.13 This report also indicated that the AMR pattern in these regions may be more ubiquitous than documented.13 Recent efforts to define the map of AMR (especially in the paediatric group) in sub-Saharan Africa have proven difficult because of limited data across West African states, thus affecting the formation of comprehensive national guidelines and protocol.6,10

The paucity of knowledge on the trends of AMR in Nigerian children has necessitated this research. This study therefore aims to determine the trend of antibiotic susceptibility of identified pathogens cultured from different clinical specimens in a sample of hospitalised Nigerian paediatric patients.

Methods

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Health Research and Ethics Committee (LREC/06/10/2193). The ethical approval was obtained in a written format after submission of a detailed study proposal and before data collection. All data-collecting procedures followed the guidelines of the National Health Research Ethics Committee, Nigeria (www.nhrec.net). As this retrospective study involved data of collected specimens with laboratory codes from routine clinical practices, informed consent was waived by the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Health Research and Ethics Committee according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Data access authorisation and restriction of sensitive records were duly observed according to the national data protection and privacy regulation. Authorised data records were kept in a locked file cabinet accessible only to the principal investigator.

Study design and population

This was a retrospective study to describe the pattern of susceptibility to antibacterial agents in children over the period from December 2021 to March 2022. The study population comprised inpatients admitted at the Massey Street Children’s Hospital in Lagos, south-western Nigeria. The hospital is currently the only public children’s hospital in the state. It is located in a densely populated suburb of the state and cares for patients from all over the state and its environs.

Clinical care and laboratory procedures

Clinical specimens, including blood, cerebrospinal fluid, ear swabs, urine, and stool, were collected from hospitalised patients, according to their disease condition, as part of clinical care by the managing physician, and submitted to the microbiological testing unit. At the study site, cultures including urine, ear, and cerebrospinal fluid followed standard microbiological methods such as morphology on culture media, gram staining, and conventional biochemical testing. Blood culture was performed according to the BD BACTECTM automated blood culture systems (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Maryland, United States). All cultures were cultured aerobically, at 37 °C for 18 h – 24 h, and negative cultures were incubated for up to 5 days for bacteria growth before being reported as negative.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The in-vitro antibiotic susceptibility of the identified pathogens was performed as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute,14 using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt, Mumbai, India). Five genera (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus spp.) were isolated and tested for antibiotic susceptibility using 15 antibiotics by disc diffusion method. The following antibiotic agents were tested: ampicillin (10 µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), azithromycin (2 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), cefoxitin (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), and ampicillin + sulbactam (10 µg). Gram-negative bacteria E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were screened for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production using ceftazidime (30 µg). The double-disk synergy test for ceftazidime (30 µg), and co-amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 µg) was used to confirm extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was detected using the cefoxitin (30 µg) disc diffusion test. The susceptibility interpretation (susceptible, intermediate, resistant) of zone clearance was according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.14 The American Type Culture Collection E. coli 25922 and S. aureus 25923 were used as quality control strains for all laboratory methods. Isolates with intermediate or resistant results on antibiotic susceptibility were classified as resistant strains during data analysis.

Data collection

We extracted data from case record files and microbiology laboratory medical records for 300 paediatric patients aged 18 hours to 14 years, who were admitted and tested in the laboratory unit of the hospital during the study dates. Information on patients’ socio-demographic characteristics, including age and gender, was obtained from the patient’s medical records. Patients with missing registration numbers, incomplete medical records, and those attending the highly active antiretroviral therapy clinic were excluded from the study. Antimicrobial sensitivity test report data were collected from the microbiology records of the laboratory unit of the hospital. Bacterial profiles were obtained by reviewing the laboratory culture database.

Data analysis

We entered the participants’ demographic characteristics, pathogen isolated, and susceptibility pattern of all isolates into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (v.16.0, Redmond, Washington, United States). Participants were divided into 5 subgroups according to their paediatric age: neonate (0–1 month), infant (˃ 1 month – 12 months), preschooler (˃ 12 months – 60 months), school age (˃ 60 months – 120 months), adolescent (˃ 120 months – 192 months). Data were analysed using IBM® SPSS® version 29 (Armonk, New York, United States). The variables (socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, bacterial isolates, and antibiotic susceptibility) were expressed as frequencies, percentages, mean ± s.d., and ratios, as considered applicable.

Results

A total of 300 participants were enrolled in this study (Table 1). There were 169 (56.4%) boys and 131 (43.6%) girls, with a ratio of 1.3:1. The mean age of the participants was 41.13 ± 52.69 months (range 0–192 months) with the largest number in the neonatal group, and the smallest number in the adolescent group. Blood (51.7%) and urine (30.3%) cultures accounted for the most requested microbiological test. Of the 300 culture results, 156 (52.0%) were culture positive while 144 (48.0%) were culture negative. The highest percentage of positive samples was found in the neonatal group (34.6%). Overall, children in the younger age groups, including neonates (18.0%), infants (10.7%), and preschool children (11.3%) accounted for most of the positive samples (Table 1).

TABLE 1: Socio-demographic and clinical data of subjects in Lagos, south-western Nigeria, from December 2021 to March 2022.
Age distribution among culture-positive samples

Of the 156 (52.0%) positive samples, boys had a higher percentage of positive samples in the neonate (37.8%), preschool (23.2%), and adolescent (11.5%) groups; the infant (23.0%) and school-age (18.9%) groups recorded a slightly higher percentage of positive samples among girls (Table 2). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent organism isolated (32.1%), and Pseudomonas spp. was the least frequent organism isolated (7.1%) among all samples (Table 2). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated organism in the neonatal (13.5%) and adolescent (3.2%) groups, whereas E. coli was the most isolated organism in all the age groups except for the neonatal (7.1%) adolescent (0.6%) age groups. Pseudomonas spp. was not isolated among infants and was infrequently detected in the neonatal and adolescent groups (both 0.6%). Streptococcus spp. was not detected in the adolescent group as compared to the younger age groups.

TABLE 2: Age distribution among culture positive samples and in relation to gender, Lagos, Nigeria, from December 2021 to March 2022.
Pattern of drug resistance among detected isolates

The most frequently recovered isolates, including S. aureus (n = 50), E. coli (n = 44) and Klebsiella spp. (n = 32), were also the most often resistant to the tested antibiotics (Table 3). Isolates were most often resistant to ampicillin (n = 58), amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (n = 54), and cefepime (n = 53), compared to the other antibiotics tested.

TABLE 3: Pattern of drug resistance in culture positive samples of children in Lagos, south-western Nigeria, from December 2021 to March 2022.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern among different age groups

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns varied by age group and isolate (Table 4). Younger age groups were more resistant to the antibiotics tested as compared to isolates from the older school-age and adolescent groups. Isolates were resistant to 11 of 15 drugs tested in the neonatal group in contrast to isolates from the school-age group, which were more sensitive to 10 of 15 drugs tested. Among all the drugs tested, isolates demonstrated more resistance to ampicillin (neonate 73.7%, infant 88.7%, preschool 82.4%, school age 85.7%) and cefuroxime (neonate 56.7%, infant 73.3%, preschool 52.4%). In contrast, isolates showed more sensitivity to meropenem (neonate 84.6%, infant 88.2%, preschool 84.2%, school age 85.7%, adolescent 100.0%) and erythromycin (neonate 81.2%, infant 100.0%, preschool 66.7%, school age 100.0%, adolescent 75.0%) in the majority of the age groups. Isolates from the preschool group were more resistant to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (58.3%), cefotaxime (54.5%), and cefuroxime (52.4%). This differed from the infant group which exhibited more resistance pattern to cefepime (52.0%), azithromycin (66.7%), and cefuroxime (73.3%). Likewise, isolates detected in the neonatal group were more resistant to ceftriaxone (57.1%) and ofloxacin (66.7%), as compared to the rest of the subgroups.

TABLE 4: Susceptibility pattern from positive samples among different age groups from Lagos, south-western Nigeria, from December 2021 to March 2022.

Discussion

This retrospective study demonstrated the varying pattern of antibiotic susceptibility in children. The bacterial species studied have shown strong associations with drug resistance globally and are part of the most important consideration of the WHO’s research for new antimicrobial discovery and development.15

Our results show that the highest number of positive samples were from the neonatal group, and blood specimens contributed to more than half of specimens processed. This observation probably points to the alarming rate of neonatal sepsis and the rising cases of septicaemia among children, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Our findings are in agreement with previous reports from Nigeria and Gambia.16,17

The pathogenic organisms studied are part of the list of emerging bacteria threats as highlighted by Fair et al.18 We agree with this report, as our findings revealed similar trends, with S. aureus, E. coli and Klebsiella spp. having the highest resistance profile among the drugs tested.18

Staphylococcus aureus, which was the most isolated organism among all the subjects studied, also had the highest resistance profile. Cassat et al.19 in their review emphasised the rapidly evolving nature of S. aureus, producing aggressive resistant strains.19 This organism is also believed to be the most prevalent infective paediatric pathogen in several parts of the world, posing a significant threat without newer therapeutic options.18,19

The isolates included in this study also exhibited more resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, cefuroxime and cefepime. Previous African studies have reported high resistance to all the drugs except for cefepime.20,21,22,23 The high prevalence observed in our study may be explained by the fact that information obtained were from records of patients on admission who were more likely to require antimicrobials compared with outpatients. Likewise, the observed high rate of resistance could be associated with pre-exposure to a wide variety of antibiotics with optimal or sub-optimal dosages before their referral to our hospital. We also note that ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, cefuroxime and cefepime are all under the WHO Access, Watch, Reserve classification of antibiotics to support antimicrobial stewardship programmes in the hospitals.24 These drugs, recommended by the WHO, are the most prescribed to children currently by physicians, especially in suburban and rural Nigeria. Resistance to these drugs suggests a disturbing shift to antibiotics considered reserved under the WHO classification intended for severe infections.24,25

We recorded a higher resistance pattern in younger children compared with school aged children and adolescents. This is similar to previous documented reports from different parts of Africa.3,10,17,26,27,28,29 Children, especially those under 5 years of age, receive more antibiotics than adults due to frequent bouts of infections. Furthermore, blurring insights to mechanism of paediatric pathogenic organism, coupled with scarce data on resistance patterns in this age group, may increase antibiotic resistance in these age groups.30 This may be especially true in sub-Saharan Africa, which is considered a resource-poor region.

This study also noted the high resistance profile of isolates within the neonatal group. This observation is in resonance with previous reports on the mounting resistance pattern in neonatal sepsis.31,32 These authors have also noted that E. coli and Klebsiella spp. are dominant resistant pathogens isolated in neonatal sepsis. From our results, meropenem remains an available option as it shows a high sensitivity rate; however, this drug has been designated by WHO as a reserved drug and should be used under strict antibiotic policy.24

Limitations

The data used in this retrospective study were from records of hospitalised children in our facility who may have been infected with multi-drug resistant bacterial pathogens not reported in our study. The presence of additional multi-drug resistant pathogens not included in our analyses could have altered the susceptibility pattern reported here. However, our findings can be used as part of ongoing arguments on national awareness programmes on antimicrobial resistance in Nigeria.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated a higher antibiotic resistance in younger children compared with school aged children and adolescents. The pathogens studied were resistant in all age groups to the most available and empirically used antibacterial agents in Nigeria: ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, and cefepime. In awareness of this emerging threat, we believe this is a stimulation towards strengthening antimicrobial stewardship programmes and effective surveillance systems following current WHO guidelines at local, state and national levels in Nigeria.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the microbiology unit of the laboratory department, and the Health Information and Medical Records department at Massey Street Children’s Hospital for their contributions.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. All of the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted article and approved the submission. A.O.O. and M.A.L. conceived, designed and planned the study. A.O.O. collated the data and performed the analysis and acted for all correspondence. A.O.O. and O.T.O. designed the methods. A.O.O., M.A.L., O.T.O., and C.A.M. participated in drafting the article and have thoroughly checked and revised the article for necessary changes in format, grammar and English standard. All authors read and approved the final version of the article. All authors read and approved the article.

Sources of support

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.

References

  1. Antoñanzas F, Goossens H. The economics of antibiotic resistance: A claim for personalised treatments. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:483–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-018-1021-z
  2. Fight antimicrobial resistance: Protect mothers and newborns. In 4th global conference of women deliver. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016.
  3. Fadare J, Olatunya O, Oluwayemi O, Ogundare O. Drug prescribing pattern for under-fives in a paediatric clinic in south-western Nigeria. Ethiopian J Health Sci. 2015;25(1):73–78. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v25i1.10
  4. James PB, Wardle J, Steel A, Adams J. Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(5):e000895. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000895
  5. Le Doare K, Barker CI, Irwin A, Sharland M. Improving antibiotic prescribing for children in the resource-poor setting. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(3):446–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12320
  6. Collignon P. Antibiotic resistance: Are we all doomed? Intern Med J. 2015;45(11):1109–1115.
  7. Mahmoud M, Yahyaoui G, Benseddik N. Hemocultures: Profil bactériologique et sensibilité aux antibiotiques. Maroc Méd. 2010;32(2):117–120. https://doi.org/10.48408/IMIST.PRSM/mm-v32i2.1231
  8. Lee AC, Chandran A, Herbert HK, et al. Treatment of infections in young infants in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of frontline health worker diagnosis and antibiotic access. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10):e1001741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001741
  9. Anejo-Okopi JA, Okojokwu OJ, Ramyil SM, et al. Bacterial and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection isolated from asymptomatic and symptomatic diabetic patients attending tertiary hospital in Jos, Nigeria. Trends Med. 2017;17(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.15761/TiM.1000108
  10. Williams PC, Isaacs D, Berkley JA. Antimicrobial resistance among children in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(2):e33–e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30467-X
  11. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance global report on surveillance: 2014 summary. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2014.
  12. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance status in Africa from the One Health approach perspective: Analytical facts sheet:2024. Integrated African Health Observatory, WHO African region.
  13. Wangai FK, Masika MM, Lule GN, et al. Bridging antimicrobial resistance knowledge gaps: The East African perspective on a global problem. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212131
  14. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 2020. 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA. Available at https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CLSI-2020.pdf
  15. World Health Organization. Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug-resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2017.
  16. Meremikwu MM, Nwachukwu CE, Asuquo AE, Okebe JU, Utsalo SJ. Bacterial isolates from blood cultures of children with suspected septicaemia in Calabar, Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis. 2005;8(5):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-110
  17. Chaw PS, Schlinkmann KM, Raupach-Rosin H, et al. Antibiotic use on paediatric inpatients in a teaching hospital in the Gambia, a retrospective study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0380-7
  18. Fair RJ, Tor Y. Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century. Perspect Med Chem. 2014;6:PMC-S14459. https://doi.org/10.4137/PMC.S14459
  19. Cassat JE, Thomsen I. Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2021;34(5):510–518. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000752
  20. Kumburu HH, Sonda T, Mmbaga BT, et al. Patterns of infections, aetiological agents and antimicrobial resistance at a tertiary care hospital in northern Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22(4):454–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12836
  21. Moremi N, Claus H, Mshana SE. Antimicrobial resistance pattern: A report of microbiological cultures at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2082-1
  22. Mikomangwa WP, Bwire GM, Kilonzi M, et al. The existence of high bacterial resistance to some reserved antibiotics in tertiary hospitals in Tanzania: A call to revisit their use. Infect Drug Resist. 2020:1831–1838. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S250158
  23. Tadesse BT, Ashley EA, Ongarello S, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Africa: A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2713-1
  24. World Health Organization. The selection and use of essential medicines: Report of the WHO Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, 2021 (including the 22nd WHO model list of essential medicines and the 8th WHO model list of essential medicines for children). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021. Available at https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-MHP-HPS-EML-2023.01
  25. Mnyambwa NP, Mahende C, Wilfred A, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from routine clinical specimens from Referral Hospitals in Tanzania: A prospective hospital-based observational study. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;3:869–878. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S294575
  26. Olivier BM, NGatimo V, Chrysostome GJ. Epidemiology and sensitivity profile of blood culture isolates at The Pediatric University Hospital of Bangui. J Pediatr Neonatal Biol. 2022;7(2):87–96. https://doi.org/10.33140/JPNB.07.02.02
  27. Nebbioso A, Ogundipe OF, Repetto EC, et al. When first line treatment of neonatal infection is not enough: Blood culture and resistance patterns in neonates requiring second line antibiotic therapy in Bangui, Central African Republic. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):1–1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02911-w
  28. Berkley JA, Lowe BS, Mwangi I, et al. Bacteremia among children admitted to a rural hospital in Kenya. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040275
  29. Brent AJ, Ahmed I, Ndiritu M, et al. Incidence of clinically significant bacteraemia in children who present to hospital in Kenya: Community-based observational study. Lancet. 2006;367(9509):482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68180-4
  30. Yu D, Zheng Y, Shen A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in pediatric infectious diseases: Antimicrobial resistance, resistance mechanisms and antimicrobial use. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1287051. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1287051
  31. Rallis D, Giapros V, Serbis A, Kosmeri C, Baltogianni M. Fighting antimicrobial resistance in neonatal intensive care units: Rational use of antibiotics in neonatal sepsis. Antibiotics. 2023;12(3):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030508
  32. Tam PY, Bekker A, Bolaji OB, et al. Neonatal sepsis and antimicrobial resistance in Africa. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7(10):677–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00167-0


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.